AI's content use battles: What you need to know

()

OpenAI's business model relies on unfettered access to copyrighted material, but it is not crucial for society to allow it for free.
The New York Times and other publishers believe they should be compensated for their content that OpenAI uses.
There may be a need for revenue sharing deals or a royalty scheme in order to utilize large language models without infringing on copyright.
Google's profitability would not be significantly impacted by paying more for content or less, so the distribution of resources and money is important.
The Times took legal action because they did not find negotiations with OpenAI productive, and they want to challenge assumptions early on.
The media industry is struggling to find profitable models, and if there is no partnership or royalty agreement with AI, it could further contract.
The paywall model may not work if AI can access information regardless, posing a challenge for media companies like the Times.